Editor: There IS NO automatic birthright citizenship for
the children of foreigners. The person who wrote the 14th said
so. If you are not functionally illiterate in English, and have
a public-school education where they actually taught English
grammar:
Senator Jacob Howard, co-author of the citizenship clause of the
14th Amendment, stated in 1866, "Every Person born within the
limits of the United States, and subject to their (SB1070)
jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a
citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include
persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens,
(Dependent clause =) //who belong to the families of
ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of
the United States,// (includes legal visitors)
but will include every other class of persons." (Emphasis added)
Editor: Obama is merely congratulating his fellow Muslims
during Ramadan for another conquest over non-Muslim dhimmi,
who are the remainder of defeated Americans, with whom he shares
neither religion, citizenship nor dhimmitude.
Note: There is a video of Obama cuts where he says
several times he is a Muslim, including a Stephanopoulis interview
where he says, "About my Muslim faith...". Stephanopoulis corrects
him to say "Christian". A Freudian Slip? That video has appeared
on this site.
WND/Farah:
Obama's Ramadan blessing
Renew America:
Obama: the Manchurian candidate
WND:
Mystery solved! Why Americans think president is Muslim
Am. Thinker:
Islam is the New Communism
Ed: PRECISELY! No separation of church and state. The
religious demands of the Koran violate the establishment clause of
the Constitution. As such, it is an ILLEGAL religion in the U.S.
Therefore, there are NO moderate Muslims, only Muslim lies, which
the Koran specifically authorizes when subverting non-Muslims.
WND/Morse:
Imam Rauf's gradualist Islam
Am. Thinker:
Is Islam Compatible With Constitutional Government?
WND/Darwish:
Shariah for Dummies
Editor: It is our Creator and his "natural law" which
is the adjudicator of the fruits of our actions. When the state
assumes that function it becomes The Usurper...in a Christian
context: Satan. Given the actions of our current government in
Washington, that is exactly who they have become.
Nor is that a revelation to those in power, who
know very well that is whom they serve.
I will tell you something that almost cost me my
life for knowing it: Most every lawyer in high government
office knows that that is whom he or she serves, and that every
judge in this country in high office knows that his or her
black robes are those of a confirmed high-priest of that
Usurper - though they may well call him by some other name. It
is no coincidence that the Pope, the Vicar of Christ, wears
white robes, and the Anti-Christ wears black.
Ms. Angle, whether she knows it or not, has exactly
NAILED IT!!!
WND:
Prop 8: Federal judge nixes California 'gay'-marriage ban
Examiner (Wash):
Justice Department steers money to favored groups
WND:
Elena Kagan tied to Obama's birth certificate
Ed: The Usurper's baptismal rituals.
WND:
Judge OK with government prying into personal information
Ed: So it's OK if the feds pry into our affairs
in public databases, but we go to prison when we look into
Obama's and those of the new ruling-class politicians'.
WND/Klayman:
Judges gone wild!
WND:
Watchdog: We'll seek Kagan's disbarment and impeachment
WND:
1-man, 6-vote racial plan used to choose board's 1st minority
Ed: So another racist, anti-sexist judge in a racist,
anti-sexist government discriminates race where it is not "real",
but a "social construct", and another refuses to discriminate
sex, where sex-differences are "real" and "natural".
This shows exactly how doubly deranged, if not
demonic, our judges and politicians have become. This is
total madness.
"The great object of my fear is the federal judiciary.
That body, like gravity, acting with noiseless & unalarming
advance [is] gaining ground step by step... Let the eye of
vigilance never be closed."
And:
“On every question of construction carry ourselves back to
the time when the constitution was adopted, recollect the
spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what
meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against
it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.”
--- Thomas Jefferson ---
Editor: As is usual, one has to go to Canadian papers for the
truth. What is clear is that DOJ deliberately took the Bolton path
to deny State sovereignty.
U. S. Constitution, Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2:
"In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and
Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the
Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other
Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate
Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions,
and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make."
(Emphasis added)
Editor: Here's proof our political class is now our
ruling class. They are above the law, and know it. They
cover for each other so that you don't.
Maybe they should spend some time recalling
what happened to the French ruling class, when they acted
in similar fashion! Do I hear creaking ox carts?
Am. Thinker:
The Productive Class and the American Aristocracy
Yahoo!: Colorado Republican Buck attacks tea party's 'birthers'
Ed: Yet again we hear from the neocon branch of our
ruling elite. His sponsors are that branch of the
Republican ruling class seeking to subvert the tea
party movement from within.
Face it men, you have lost our culture.
We don't need more shysters to maintain the status
quo. We need mama-grizzlies, women, who can nourish
and restore our national cultures' constitutional
values. There is NOTHING relative about those rules.
They are absolute in each and every national culture.
Our hyper-rationalized male elites have 'relativized'
them to meaninglessness in the diseased academia
that is their training ground. As a male, you make
me ashamed of my sex! Off to the wood-shed with you!
(WND/Lewis:
Why housewives will save the world)
Telegraph (UK):
The Obama presidency increasingly resembles a
modern-day Ancien Regime: extravagant and out of
touch with the American people
Ed: Sounds like the ox carts are rolling!
WND:
'1st term of Obama administration is over'
* * * * *
IS OBAMA - AN ILLEGAL President?
THE TRUTH About His Citizenship!
You MUST SEE THIS! (YouTube, 5:55)
Editor: So now our stupid, racist* government
is going to discriminate races in order to sue a state
for discriminating races. This is not just evil. It's
positively Satanic. Talk about the pot calling the
kettle black...
*NOTE: The government is racist because it
enacts laws wherein its 'creatures' are granted special
treatment not given to others. Finally some equally
stupid scientists are beginning to realize "race" is not
a "thing", but a "social construct"!!!
Wash Times:
Justice: Sanctuary cities are no Arizona
Editor: What is abundantly clear is that the
White House and the Department of Justice have become
nothing but a den of shysters (Yiddish: "shit-peddlers").
Boston.com:
ICE director: states shouldn't follow Arizona lead
Ed: And now you can add ICE to the list.
ABC News:
President Obama, White House: Al Qaeda Is Racist
Ed: As we can now see, only the 'god' in
the White House is qualified to judge who is racist and
who is not! Did we just hear from "The Usurper"...?
"Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same
way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the
measure you use, it will be measured to you."
--Matthew 7: 1-2, The Sermon on the Mount--
Editor: In my view, once passed, there are only two
ways to repeal this constitutional abortion, since only one
third of the Senate can be replaced at a time, and since,
after two years, even new politicians are institutionalized,
political-power addicts. They may modify the bill under
pressure, but they will never kill it and give up the power.
The only true repeals will be an armed
revolution or a secession from the Union by freedom-loving
states. Either of these two amounts to a constitutional
crisis and a likely war.
However, there is a third constitutional crisis
that, if faced and resolved, could remove the damage of
Obamacare's seizure of power. That is resolution in the
D.C. Circuit Court of Obama's eligibility under the
natural-born citizenship clause. Under the original meaning
of natural-born, as used by the Framers and as defined in
The Law of Nations of the time, a natural-born citizen
had to be born of TWO U.S. citizens and be born on U.S. soil.
He/she could NOT be a dual citizen with a foreign parent, as
Obama admits he was at birth. Since he is not a natural-born
citizen, and, therefore, never can be president, any bill
he signs into law is null and void. Since it is unsigned by
an eligible president, the most the bill can be is a law
rejected by what amounts to a pocket veto, and, at the least,
is no law at all.
(See WND:
Court told 'citizen' Obama actually may be alien)
This may be the ONLY way, short of war, the
damage of Obamacare's passage may be completely overcome.
Oh, yes. Should you turn to a court on the
mandate issue, it will likely only say something about a
"living constitution", by which it really means, "A dead
constitution". And why do I suspect our governing class, even
knowing our 'president' is an illegal alien, will do nothing?
Because he belongs to the political elite, who are above us
plebeians of the citizen class, and, therefore, as a member of
the new nobility, he is already 'natural-born' to rule...
citizen, or not - and the constitution be damned.
WND:
Attorney links eligibility, health care challenges
Post & Email:
GINO DISIMONE, INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE FOR NEVADA GOVERNOR,
DEMANDS THAT GOVERNOR JIM GIBBONS "IMMEDIATELY TAKE ACTION"
TO DETERMINE OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY TO SERVE AS PRESIDENT
Renew America:
Obama birth certificate more urgent than ever
WND:
Kenyan official: Obama born here
SO NOW IS HRH BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, NEW LEADER
OF THE WASHINGTON DC NOBILITY, GOING TO GRACE US WITH PROOF
HE ACTUALLY SHARES CITIZENSHIP IN SOME FASHION OR OTHER WITH
US PLEBEIAN CITIZENS, OR IS BECOMING SELECTED BY THE NEW
DC ARISTOCRACY SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR THE TITLE OF
'EMPEROR OF THE WORLD'?
Ed: Is the title to be his reward in 2012 in return for
his disarming America and for destroying its economic power?
WND:
Mayor joins chorus questioning if Obama 'American'
Yahoo!/C S Monitor:
Supreme Court opens the money gates
Ed: As a 28 year manager of "S" and
"C" corporations, I can assure you THEY DON'T EXIST.
The fact the courts call them "persons" when even they,
themselves, admit they are "legal fictions", is clearly
deception. But to treat them as if they were real
persons under the Constitution is not just a legal
fiction, it is a legal figment, a hallucination,
and is an irrational, misplaced concreteness.
Because 'groups' do not exist in nature, but
are abstractions, and a creation of the mind of man for
a common purpose, they therefore can not be given the
Constitution's "natural rights", which arise solely from
our bodies, as given to us by our Creator. For the Court
to seize this power, and to confer it upon an abstraction,
which is a creation of their own minds, is to claim for
themselves the power of the Creator of the Universe. In
so doing, they make themselves into the high priests of
The Usurper.
If corporations (and unions, too) are allowed
to engage in "petition for their grievances", and to
'vote' with money from their treasuries, they are acting
in no way significantly different than in typical ballot
fraud, as the courts have held from Independence that
voting with money is equivalent to voting with ballots.
Further, an attack ad against a specific candidate is
definitely a public petition of grievances by a fictional
entity that has no such specified right under the
Constitution, except for a generalized, free-speech right
as conferred on all bodies that have mouths. However, this
is not a free speech issue as claimed in the Court's
arguments, and doing so is an obfuscation of the true case.
Yahoo!/C S Monitor:
Supreme Court's campaign ruling: a bad day for democracy.
Ed: Mostly on target, but it is a good
day for democracy (mobocracy), and a terrible day
for the Constitutional Republic.
The Progressive:
Horrific Supreme Court Ruling on Campaign Finance. Time to Amend the Constitution: Corporations Are Not Persons!
Move to Amend:
Sign the Motion to Amend the Constitution
Taxation Without Representation
- Tea Party Time for the Courts?
An open letter to our current SCOTUS.
Ed: Ronald Reagan correctly has said that "Corporations
don't pay taxes. Only people pay taxes."
(See: WND:
The fundamental deception of corporate taxes)
The issue of corporations paying corporate
income taxes and, therefore, are entitled to political
representation, is entirely bogus. The taxes are paid by the
shareholders, or by the consumers of the goods and services
offered by the company. This is true of all companies except
sole proprietorships and "S" corporations, where the taxes
are paid on the tax returns of the owners.
So what the court is really faced with is that
it must acknowledge that corporate taxation is another legal
fiction (fraud, in this case), end it, or grant
'representation' to the company. However, then an issue is
raised, that in granting 'representation' equally to unions,
it is granting 'representation without taxation'.
This court of shysters (Yiddish, "sh*t peddler")
is now even further trapped in its web of frauds with regard
to its positions on the tax on individual labor, which is
taxation with representation, but has been implicitly
held to be an invalid tax by its prior rulings that the
"16th Amendment granted no new taxing powers to the Federal
Government" (Other than the constitutionally granted one for
"direct" taxes).
"What a tangled web we do weave, when at first we
practice to deceive". Hey judges in black robes, are yours
the black robes of a righteous judge, or those of a high
priest of Satan, The Usurper?
More representation without taxation: Review Journal.
Yahoo!:
Left and right united in opposition to controversial SCOTUS
decision
Ed: When are these shysters going to quit
believing a "think" is a "thing"? Acting as if a conception
(corporation, union) is as 'real' as a natural phenomenon
(body, bodies) is 'thinking' a thing is there that isn't, and
is no less a hallucination than seeing a ghost as there, that
isn't. Under the Constitution only people can 'vote' with
money.
Newsmax:
Chamber Emerges As Formidable Political Force
Ed: It is now clear that federal judges are no
longer guardians of the Constitution, but are now the cheap
harlots of the ruling class - willing to sell their own
bodies and those of the citizenry as pimps for their
corporate and union figments.
If the foregoing is not enough, here is proof
that these demons in black robes are truly deranged:
"The 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits hotels and restaurants
from discriminating based on race and thus prohibits inactivity,
" said Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California
Irvine School of Law, noting that law relied upon the Commerce
Clause. "The Supreme Court has said that Congress can regulate
economic activity that has a substantial effect on interstate
commerce. Buying or refusing to buy insurance is economic
activity. The effect on the economy is enormous." (Source:
Newsmax)
NY Times:
Florida Suit Poses Challenge to Health Care Law
West’s Encyclopedia of American Law - Commerce:
"The buying and selling of goods, especially on a
large scale, as between cities or nations."
Ed: Buying or selling insurance for cash or barter
is commerce. Refusing to buy insurance is non-commerce, as no
money or barter is exchanged for ANY good or service. In fact,
refusing to pay is actually foregone consumption - savings
- the opposite of commerce.
Since savings are not income, they are not subject
to tax, and if lent or borrowed, permit only taxation of any
income from that lending commercial activity in the form of
interest, paid or imputed.
Nor can an excise tax be imposed on the savings, as
savings are not goods or services engaged in change of ownership
- even if lent for interest income.
The legal argument that refusing to buy insurance
affects interstate commerce is logical nonsense, since, in the
refusal itself there is complete negation of commerce.
Only in a deranged, anti-capitalist, debt-driven economy
would inaction be viewed as affect.
Am. Thinker:
Citizens or Subjects: Keynesian Economics
The Court and the 2nd Amendment:
The First Amendment states:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise, thereof; or
abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right
of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the
Government for a redress of grievances." (Emphasis added)
The Second Amendment states:
"A well regulated (means, "well-trained") Militia, being
necessary to the security of a free State, the
right of the people (i.e., of the State of Texas, for example)
to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." (Emphasis added)
Ed: The Supreme Court in 1876 ruled that the 2nd Amendment
did not apply to the States...they lied. In fact, it applies
primarily to the States.
Why? Because they wished to establish the
pre-eminence of the "Union" over the States after the Civil War;
because they wished to justify the forcible incorporation of the
State Militias into the Army during the war, and to provide a
rationale for the draft [which would ordinarily be banned as
involuntary servitude - i.e., the State Militia is a duty of
citizenship of the State, not of the United States. Yes, the
Congress has the power to raise (voluntary) armies, but not
Militias].
The 14th Amendment's "incorporation" feature
applies to the 1st-Amendment granted rights to limit the States'
ability to regulate those rights. It could also be interpreted
to apply to the Second Amendment, but the 2nd Amendment applies
primarily to the STATES and not to Congress, which is not
mentioned, and which is 'the state', but NOT a "free State"
(capital "S") as described in the amendment.
Since a well-trained Militia is NECESSARY to a free
State, the State Militia is a constitutional requirement of the
several States; militia service is a duty of every citizen of
the State, and "the people" need be ready, constantly armed, and
as well-trained in arms as they were in the Colonies at the time
of the Revolution.
Therefore, the 2nd Amendment establishes a DUTY for
every State to have a Militia (which Congress cannot deny), and
each able-bodied citizen must be armed, trained and available for
immediate duty on call from the State (NOT the "Government", as
in the First Amendment). (See: NWV/T Baldwin:
'Militia' Used As Manipulation)
This is the Swiss model of armed citizenship, which
the founders were well acquainted with, and which they copied,
but applied at the State, and not the Federal level.
Thus, the ruling in the Heller Case is correct, since
Washington, DC is Federal jurisdiction ONLY, and is NOT a "State".
Therefore, it has no Militia duty for its residents, and the DC
District Court has no jurisdiction over the Second Amendment, as
it is a constitutional duty of the States to have and maintain a
well-trained citizenry as militiamen. Therefore, since it is not a
State, its residents are all citizens of one of the several States,
and have the right (and duty) to keep and bear arms as citizens of
their respective States' Militias. Generally, the Supreme Court's
rulings since the Civil War have always tended to hide the role
of State citizenship, and to expand the notion of Federal
citizenship in its place. This is yet one more instance of that.
In fact, it is the 14th Amendment that, post Civil War, makes
citizens of the States, citizens of the United States, buttresses
the Heller ruling, yet papers over and disguises many of the
Federal usurpations of States' rights arising from that war.
None-the-less, should the Supreme Court rule that the
Second Amendment does not apply to the States, regardless of the
evidence to the contrary, the States may use the doctrine of
"interposition" (the State right is constitutional, even though the
Supreme Court may hold otherwise) on a priori 2nd Amendment
grounds, even if the court declines the right through "incorporation"
under the 14th Amendment.
NWV/Baldwin:
The Hutaree Militia Raid
Ed: Which is exactly what the Branch Davidians were
preparing to defend against, too. DHS' Napolitano is Janet Reno II.
NWV/Baldwin:
Hutaree Update
WND:
Supreme Court says you can 'keep and bear arms'
Ed: The court chose to use the 14th Amendment's
"incorporation" feature rather than overthrow a little fraudulent
stare decisis upon whom the amendment originally applied.
Virtually ALL the historical evidence shows that the colonies/states
were the targets of the militia clause, and NOT the federal
government.
George Washington's Army was nothing but the colonies'
militias made into a unified command to be well-trained (original
meaning of "well regulated", as trainers in his army were called
"regulators").
NWV/T. Baldwin:
McDonald v. Chicago: The Great Misunderstanding Of State Sovereignty
Part 1
Am. Free Press:
Gun Victory in Chicago
WND:
14th Amendment is a fraud that should be repealed
* * * * *
Glenn Beck: Obama Administration Most Corrupt of All Time (Newsmax TV)
Ed: As a lay Buddhist/Christian I have no authority to
speak for either of these religions. However, according to
the Judge's understanding of the "natural rights" of the
Constitution as manifest in the individual body, I see
his vision of the Founders' "natural law" and "natural
rights" as similar to the Oriental religions' Law of Karma.
Also, for me as a person with scientific training, I see
the Law of Karma as no more than the law of cause-and-effect
as portrayed in the natural sciences.
Thus, the body you are born with (your concrete,
nature component), and the circumstances you were raised in
(your abstract, nurture component), will develop your
self-image, and, together, will determine how your
Karma/"natural rights"/cause-and-effect will evolve.
In my view, "natural law" is why most of the
world's religions, as well as the "natural rights" of our
Constitution, teach that your actions are what you believe,
and it's not what you say or think that you will be
accountable for under natural, religious or Constitutional
law. For it is your actions and inactions that alter your
fate, as well as the fates of those with whom you interact.
When viewed in this light, the Founders' "natural
law' is nothing more or less than their understanding of the
law of cause-and-effect (natural science), which in the
Orient, is the Law of Karma, as found in both Hinduism and
Buddhism. If there is to be a "New World Order", one hopes
that it will be based more on a universal understanding of
these beliefs, than upon some arbitrary ideology imposed by
the socially psychopathic personalities found in all
societies, who lust after power above all else.
Thus the Asian proverb:
"If you understand, the world is as it is. If you do not
understand, the world is as it is".
Ed: The Senate bill is also discriminatory as to
'race', ethnicity and sex:
The Senate bill requires that "priority" for federal grants be
given to institutions offering "preferential" admissions to
minorities (race, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, and
religion). Institutions training social workers, psychologists,
psychiatrists, behavioral pediatricians, psychiatric nurses, and
counselors will be ineligible for federal grants unless they
enroll "individuals and groups from different racial, ethnic,
cultural, geographic, religious, linguistic, and class
backgrounds, and different genders and sexual orientations."
(Source:
Eagle Forum)
Al Sharpton: We Won't Have True Social Justice
Until Everything is 'Equal in Everybody's House'
Ed: Rev. Sharpton is preaching pure, unadulterated Satanism
here. Satan is always the usurper of natural law and of the law
of cause and effect in order to enforce equal outcomes.
Here is the Church of Satan, and all who worship in
it, preach this identical doctrine.
Renew America:
Social Justice pastors, your chickens will come home to roost
* * * * *
CertifiGate:
U.S. Senator supports Obama Birth Certificate Lawsuits
(YouTube, 0:48)
Michelle Obama: Barack's Home Country Is Kenya.mp4 (YouTube, 3:00)
Post & Email:
Faux First Lady admits husband born in Kenya
Ed: Obama put his 'race' on the census form as "African-American".
There is no such THING as an African-American race. African-American
Is a nationality - a dual-nationality. The President of the United
States CANNOT be a dual-national under the Constitution's natural-born
citizen clause. By his own and his wife's admission he is a foreigner -
even if he has been naturalized since. His home country is Kenya, even
if he was born in Hawaii, which he likely was not, since one of his own
administration (until fired for saying so), Gov. Bill Richardson, has
said on a video that Obama "Is an immigrant".
It is now clear that due to several issues, Barack Hussein
Obama is an illegitimate president.
Further, since the current Congress has failed in its duty
to certify the president-elect's eligibility, and continues to ignore
strong evidence he is not, this Congress is now illegitimate too, by
means of breech of one of its most important constitutional duties.
Even more, since state and federal courts have consistently
REFUSED to hear a case on the merits of his legitimacy, they too are
now illegitimate. Should the D.C. District Court, which by the Quo
Warranto statute, is charged with the responsibility to determine
eligibility for all D.C. federal officers - serving or not - fail to rule
on this matter, then all three branches of the federal government are
now illegitimate by breech of duty as well.
When that is the case, as it likely soon will be, it falls
to the states to exercise their responsibility to enforce the Constitution
by invoking nullification, interposition or secession, as the case may be.
It should be clear to some now why Obama rode a Lincoln train
to his inauguration, and why he took his bungled presidential oath on
Lincoln's bible. It too seems clear that he and his have planned this final
destruction of the Constitution and the very nation of the United States
from very beginning. The final coup-de-grace, it would seem, will come when
he invokes his "civilian army" to crush the resistance of the states under
a martial law declaration, or even under another continental civil war,
since he cannot trust the U.S. Military to carry out his plans, because of
their oath to defend the Constitution, and not him. It also would explain
why he reportedly gave NORTHCOM instructions to increase its troop-strength
via returning millions of foreign-serving military to the U.S..
World peace by war at home?
If this be the case, it is a sad day for America that its
institutions of government have become so corrupt that they cannot
equal a successful struggle by even a banana republic such as Honduras,
in order to get rid of a two-bit dictator.
WND:
NPR archive describes Obama as 'Kenyan-born'
WND:
Kenyan officials affirm, Obama 'son of this soil'
WND:
NPR changes archive regarding president's birth
POINT OF ORDER! OBAMASSIAH CANNOT BE A NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES under the Law of
Nations. His father was a British citizen at the time of Obama II's
birth. So was his British-citizen son, dual citizen or not (mother
too young). His father was on a student visa and wasn't a resident
alien. Under interpretations by the courts of Section II, Article
I, and of the 14th Amendment, he is NOT eligible to be president.
The issue under argument with the birth certificate is whether or
not he is a native born citizen, or even a citizen at all, or
merely a foreigner. Even if he was born in the U.S., it could be a
red herring - a diversion from the real issue: Not natural-born,
hence ineligible.
See: WND/Donofrio:
Why Obama is ineligible - regardless of his birthplace
As clearly explained by the Framers and Pres. Theodore
Roosevelt, there are
NO hyphenated Americans.
For a foreigner, an outsider, culture is as morally
relative as are the rules for chess and checkers - though played on
the same board (the Earth). However, once you are living in either
game, you MUST play by the rules, or you are nothing but a cheat,
and are rightly expelled for it.
Since it is the Constitution and the Congress that make
the offices and rules for our American game of chess, for courts to
adjudicate them, and for the President to enforce them, the President
alone MUST embody the abstract nurture that unifies the many into
one. That can only be obtained in the first six years or so of life,
starting from about 30 weeks of pregnancy, when the fetus begins to
recognize its mother's voice, then when the newborn learns the
language and meaning of its nurturers' rules, while rejecting those
of 'outsiders', and, finally, is acculturated enough for public
schooling - which purpose is to finalize social unity, and NOT to
spread the 'diversity' and the social conflict so popular with
politicos, judicial activists and
moral-relativist college professors. (More 'Obamacare' for
your kids?)
This is why the Founding Fathers required a natural-born
citizenship, and why this 'non-president', through no fault of his
own, and by his own admission of his now-lapsed British citizenship,
is not qualified to be President of the United States. In fact, it
is why, lacking the nurture, he is an
'anti-American' non-president.
If you are a U.S. citizen, or a legal resident, you are obliged
to play the game of American chess when on U.S. territory.
Senator Jacob Howard, co-author of the citizenship
clause of the 14th Amendment, stated in 1866, "Every Person
born within the limits of the United States, and subject to
their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national
law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course,
include persons born in the United States who are foreigners,
aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign
ministers accredited to the Government of the United States,
but will include every other class of persons."
The Fourteenth Amendment states, "(A) Persons born or
naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."
"The kind of money that "talks" — that can buy people off, finance
revolutions, launder money, pay to rig voting machines, manipulate
allies into positions of power (czars, anyone?), conveniently crash
markets (as George Soros did in England in 1992, Asia in 1997, and, I
believe, the U.S. in September 2008), make people disappear, make
birth certificates and other vital records disappear, and then make
sure that an entire media, Congress, and court system is terrified of
'going there.' "
(Ed: Like the $550 Bn run on Wall Street banks that triggered the
'panic'?)
Lucas Smith - Barack Obama's Birth
Certificate - rotated 90 degrees (YouTube 3:08)
Ed: The analysis of impeachment is wrong. A
'non-president' can not be impeached. He can be tried in DC
Court, which is the court that determines federal office
eligibility. He could then be removed as a non-CIC by the
military on a court order
much as Honduras removed its president Zelaya on a
constitutional basis. Obama is careful to say that was a
military coup, and to assert an elected president cannot be
guilty of a crime, because he, as a 'constitutional scholar',
knows very well that may be what lies ahead for himself.
Though I am not a lawyer, I suspect that a
writ of mandamus or other similar order from the Supreme
Court to the Attorney General or Deputy Attorney General
would require them to try the matter in the DC Court
without a separation of powers issue being involved, since
the court is trying a constitutional non-president like
it would any other government official who may not have
been eligible for his elected or appointed office, whether
he or she now occupies the office or not. (Quo Warranto
statute, 1878).
WND:
D.C. court case demands Obama explain eligibility
HERE IT IS: WHO CAUSED THE WORLD DEPRESSION, AND WHY!
Rense.com:
The Tower Of Basel - Secretive Plans For Issuing A Global Currency
Ed: Now you know where the $550 billion run on the N.Y.
Fed and banks that triggered the world-wide depression came from...
all to trigger the Basel II accords' delayed imposition on U.S.
banks of its rules for marketable securities (MBS here) until the
result would be collapse of the banking sector here and world-wide
...with the U.S. to blame (with a little help from Obama).
Business Insider:
The International Bank Rule Which Almost Destroyed the World
Ed: Which is exactly what it was supposed to do when the
Basel II accords required mark-to-market on illiquid assets in a
manufactured reserves crunch (Like the $550 Bn run on Wall Street
banks known here as 'Paulson's Panic'.)
Moneynews:
U.S. to Seek Global Pack to Beef Up Banks by 2010
Ed: The purpose of the central banks is to create a de
facto Financial Stability Board that will allow them to set up
'Basel III' Accords for the NEXT time they get ready to loot the
world's performing assets - using them as they did the Basel II
Accords covering the same matters. The Basel II Accords were not a
failure. They were very nearly a complete success - had the U.S.
not ended mark-to-market on purposely toxified securitized mortgages
and not reduced interest rates to zero.
Business Insider:
G-20 Europeans Defeated By Tim Geithner
Ed: Well, surprise, surprise. Depending on the details,
the increased reserve requirements are beneficial. But much remains
to be seen on how they weight securitized debt and CDSs, and what it
takes to rate them AAA.
Moneynews:
Soros: Dollar Killing Global Recovery
Ed: This from the killer of the British Pound, and prime
suspect in the $550 Bn run on Wall Street money funds.
Business Insider:
The Amazing Speed Of The Global World Trade Collapse (Aka,
Paulson's Panic)
Financial Times (UK):
US prepares to push for global capital rules
Ed: The 'Crisis' was the result of excessive leverage
in combination with BIS' (Basel) overly restrictive real-asset
valuation rules. Lax financial-asset valuation ratings encouraged
excessive leverage, so increased capital requirements to reduce
leverage are part of the answer, IMO. Hey, I don't have any degrees
in economics, but the experts missed it, and I called it early on.
Maybe it's because I can see what is in front of my face!
NWV/Veon:
Global Financial Markets And You
Ed: This writer has called it from day one.
Ed: Soros was instrumental, if not causative,
in the collapse of the British Pound, where he made
much of his fortune. This raises the possibility he was
actively involved in the $550 billion run on the Wall
Street banks and mutual funds that triggered 'Paulson's
Panic', the credit crunch, and the bailout of the banks.
Like the Rothschilds did at the Battle of Waterloo, he
may have spread the leak and started the run on reserves
to enrich himself while inflicting major damage on the
U.S. economy, even as he did on that of Great Britain.
The $550 B run should be investigated, but Congress may
already suspect where the bodies lie, and not wish to
dig them up.
Examiner (Houston): George Soros and Obama: enemies of Liberty
Intellectual Conservative:
2008 Market Crash Should be Investigated
AIM:
Obama's Wall Street Bill Lets Crooks Escape (More
Paulson's Panic)
NWV/Kincaid:
Obama's Wall Street Bill Lets Crooks Escape
NWV/Kincaid:
Hedge Funds Spark World Revolution
CFP (ca):
Sonya Sotomayor Supreme Court senorita: A case of
unapologetic racism
Ed: All of Mexico's races have now been
re-defined as "La Raza Cosmica", or "The Cosmic
Race", or briefly as "La Raza". (Criollos, Indios, Negros,
Mestizos, Mulattos and Chinos: The "bronze" race of MEChA,
whose motto is: "Por la Raza todo. Fuera de la Raza
nada". For the Race, everything. Outside the Race,
nothing.) (Also See: Michelle Malkin:
AZTLAN ACADEMY? COMING TO YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD?)
Newsmax/Tantaros:
Sotomayor Is a Supreme Concern
Ed: The "critical" theory of law is no more
than saying the law is entirely subjective. However,
subjectivity's rules depend largely on your cultural
conditioning before the age of six, are a matter of
abstract nurture, not nature, and are the origin of
prejudice ("pre_judice"), which occurs in the mind
before consciousness of its object. (scientific
fact)
Objectivity is the expression of the
concrete rules of nature, which in our Constitution,
is referred to as the "natural law" of individual
rights. It is wholly a matter of nature, is the basis
of natural science, and is the same for all entities
in the universe. To deny objectivity to the law is to
overbalance the necessary stability for human life
with subjective tyrannies, which are ever the destroyers
of nations. (See balance image at page top.)
Such 'reasoning' in psychology is merely a
matter of rationalizing one's prejudices to give hidden
motives a color of objective reality...not law, but lies.
Under the U.S. Constitution there are no,
and can never be, 'group rights' (Shared subjective
abstractions replacing objective, concrete, individual
ones.) Why? Because there are no fixed 'groups' in
nature.
All that is necessary to stop 'racial
discrimination' is to stop discriminating races that
aren't there.
There is only one race. The human
race.
VDARE/Sailer:
Professor Gates, Officer Crowley, President Obama --
And The New York Fire Department
Ed: "Disparate impact" is PRECISELY what a
well-designed exam is supposed to produce: Competence vs.
incompetence...pass vs. fail.
Applying the concept of "race" to it only
shows the mental incompetence of any judge who engages
in this sort of Orwellian doublethink.
WND/Sowell:
A post-racial president?
Examiner (Dallas):
La Raza protest, counterprotest planned in Houston on illegal aliens
Renew America:
The amnesty race card
Intellectual Conservative:
The Race Card: Effective No More
Am. Thinker/Marcus:
Unexpected Outgrowths of the Tea Party Movement
WND:
Sunstein: Americans too racist for socialism
Ed: So we have yet another racist discriminating
races in a racial discrimination. Hey, estupido, social
justice under the U.S. Constitution is about individuals, not
your 'group-think'. Nor does it guarantee equal outcomes, only
equal access - again, only for individuals.
As you have measured others, so are you measured.
WND:
Anti-Anglo racist tripe
WND/Tancredo:
The price of disunity in a dangerous world
Am. Thinker:
Blaming Whitey
Ed: Discriminating race on the basis of a single
genetic characteristic (phenotypic trait) is racial
discrimination. Making a racial distinction amongst ANY humans
is racism in the mind of the discriminator. For courts and
legislatures to institute it as a matter of law is to
institutionalize racial discrimination into law.
Trying to legally define a race on the basis of
a 'group' of genetic traits is to create an abstraction that
does not exist in nature, and is always misapplied in the case
of an individual human.
Rep. McClintock:
Hawaiian Separatist Bill: HR 2314
Ed: This bill is a flagrant violation of the
15th Amendment. Of course Obama will sign it. It may even give
him a way to claim he is a "natural born citizen" of Hawaii!!!
Am. Thinker:
Dare to Ignore Race
WND:
Obama Medicare pick urges 'radical transfer of power'
Ed: Obama's new racist Medicare/Medicaid commissar.
In other words, if your skin is pink, you are a walking dead
man. "And with the measure he has used, it is measured back to
him again".
WSJ:
White House Court Brief Backs Race-Based Admissions
Ed: This move proves for all time that Obama's is a
racist administration.
WND/Mercer:
Liberty and the Civil Wrongs Act
Ed: The Racists' Rights Act of 1964 has been very
effective in compensating racists for their 'victim' fantasies
by transferring to them the unearned privileges and benefits earned
by others through their patronage of our equally racist government.
Am. Thinker:
Another Twenty Five Years of Affirmative Action
Ed: Our arrogant, power-mad government continues to
usurp natural law, the law of cause-and-effect, and the law of
Karma to impose equal outcomes on all its preferred classes,
regardless of their individual merits and abilities. Our
government has become racist, sexist and is discriminatory in
dispensing all its privileges and favors. No one is equal before
the law, and, as such, it has become the Usurper, and is Satanic
in nearly every respect.
Intellectual Conservative:
White Men Stiffed by the Obama Administration
Ed: The formula is simple: Replace the middle-class
nuclear family with a husbandless, fatherless one, where the
mother and children are the 'family' of the 'tribe'...where
the 'tribal chief' is the substitute 'father', and the 'wife'
and the children are the offspring of all tribal males (literally).
It is the African-aborigine model, which he wishes to implement
here in his 'New Africa' as the first African-American (he says)
president, in order to destroy the U.S. as a modern democratic
world power. No doubt he has some idea in mind of making it like
the country of his Kenyan cousin, Raila Odinga, whom he befriended
when he was studying at the Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow.
VDARE/Buchanan:
The New Intolerance -- Hatred Of The South Is Hatred Of America
WND/Tancredo:
The Obama race card
Examiner (Houston):
DOJ official resigns over Obama's racism
WND:
Ex-DOJ lawyer: Holder won't prosecute blacks
WND/Rush:
Barack Obama: Racist in chief
NY Post:
O's latest biz-killer
Ed: A rotten, racist government! Satan will
always have his equal outcomes in defiance of all natural law.
He is The Usurper-In-Chief. It is clear the 1964 Civil Rights
Act does not apply to our overlords of the ruling class.
White guy beaten nearly to death by Blacks for
dating a Black woman, no hate crime there
(YouTube, 2:06)
"We have room for but one flag, the American Flag. We have
room for but one language, the English language, and we have
room for but one sole loyalty, and that is a loyalty to the
American people. " - - Pres. Theodore Roosevelt
Peter Brimelow:
"The real issue here is not whether those opposing current
mass immigration are guilty of ‘racism.’ It is whether those
supporting it, and the consequent destruction of America as
it now exists, are guilty of treason."
Ed: This is an excellent portrayal of the current state
of Mexico, and of the U.S. border region. However, the suggested
intrusion of U.S. forces into Mexico in any sort of preventive
security would be a disaster for both Mexico and the United States.
This is because the Mexican people don't need American assistance to
work out their own destiny. They have already done that. Only they
can change it. It is because our own political elites would use the
trans-border occupation to turn the United States into a bi-lingual
Mexico...ruin for both countries. The open border is already
causing this sort of damage to both now in the drug wars. The first
remedy, when dealing with an infectious disease, is quarantine.
Beginning with Lyndon Johnson, whose power base began
in George Parr County on the Texas Mexican border, through Bush I,
Clinton, Bush II and now Obama, the Washington ruling elite has
allied itself with domestic corporatism and the same cronyism that
infests Mexico. The result will be their failed state's corruption
completing our failing state's fascism as implemented by all five
of the aforementioned administrations from both political
parties. This is because our elites now want the U.S. to resemble
Mexico, and not the reverse (See:
Immigration and Usurpation link.)
The Mexican revolution in the 1915-20 era caused the
same type of trans-border problems. However, the U.S. used two
different remedies. One worked and the other caused permanent
resentments by the Mexican people of the U.S. This latter was the
futile chase of Pancho Villa by Blackjack Pershing and the Army into
Mexico. The one that worked, but you never hear about, was Woodrow
Wilson's sending 100,000 troops to patrol the Rio Grande - with
artillery.
The reason the Texas solution worked is that the shield
of the Army along the border, after some skirmishes, prevented
infiltration of large groups of Mexican military into Texas. Only
small raids such as the Aniceto Pizana raid that affected my family
(below) succeeded. This shield allowed Texas Rangers and civil
police officers to perform sweeps through the Nueces Strip and other
border regions to fight bandit groups harassing Texas citizens.
Many Mexicans were killed by these officials without trial simply
because they were suspicious characters. However, the ethnic strife
in the region caused Hispanics to decide if they were Americans or
Mexicans. The former stayed and became Texans, the latter were driven
back to Mexico. For all the cultural values they may share, the
Tejanos I grew up with are not Mexicanos.
It is this historical example that shows the ONLY effective
solution for the U.S. if Mexico goes 'Worst Case' is to seal the border,
allow none or nothing in or out for the duration, until Mexico can reform
its destiny on its own. If you think we could help them with that, stop
and consider how all of our good intentions in stabilizing countries
around the world have almost all ended in failure. Only in Europe, which
was already European, did we see anything like success in nation
rebuilding. (Note: Japan is not an exception. The Japanese people
imposed their new constitution upon themselves through Emperor Hirohito,
a descendent of the goddess Amaterasu, bowing down to General McArthur's
demand from their own choice.)
IBD:
Mexico Goes To Pot, And Then Some
Ed: Mexico is now critical. The U.S. must terminate
all current passport visas and border passes to Mexico that are not
diplomatic, and must ban all travel to the country permanently.
As a 20+ year border resident I can assure you that Americans
visiting Mexico will become back-door addicts. Spring break is now, and
always has been, a chance for your college kids to experiment with dope on
the quiet in Mexico. With it legally available even in small quantities,
Americans will cross the border for their junk and become addicts - even
as they cross the border now for their cheap prescriptions.
If Mexico will not learn from this folly, let them
permanently lose the tourist trade as the price for being an international
drug pusher for its cartels. DO IT NOW, or the U.S. will become Mexico II.
KTAR (AZ):
AZ authorities condemn Mexico drug law
Examiner (Dallas):
Are drug cartels now dictating policy to Mexico City?
AZ Central:
Bold new cartels emerging in Mexico
The disease infecting Mexico is not just drugs, it is the endemic
corruption that has existed there for centuries. The Mexican corruption 'fever'
must cure itself under quarantine. Allowing even individual Mexicans into the
U.S. will bring the plague of corruption, the mordida, and their
extreme violence with them. It is all they know, and they embody it even as
they have carried the AH1N1, Mexican flu all over the world. Let the flu serve
as nature's warning, and close the southern border with Mexico completely...BOTH
ways - using deadly force when necessary.
Be Warned! There are those high up in Washington who would knowingly
allow in this corruption disease so as to re-make this country into a like
political cesspool by importing such an infection here. "Ye shall know them by
their fruits".
Senator Jacob Howard, co-author of the citizenship
clause of the 14th Amendment, stated in 1866, "Every Person
born within the limits of the United States, and subject to
their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national
law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course,
include persons born in the United States who are foreigners,
aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign
ministers accredited to the Government of the United States,
but will include every other class of persons." (Emphasis added)
The Fourteenth Amendment states, "(A) Persons born or
naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."
VIDEOS LINKED FROM THIS SITE REQUIRE
WINDOWS MEDIA PLAYER TO VIEW. Some e-mails posted require Microsoft Word to view.
NOTE: This site receives no compensation from anyone for its opinions and comments. This site does not support any single candidate from a particular party exclusively, but does contribute support, time and money to those candidates from any party with whom it agrees politically, economically or socially.
NOTE II: Many of the pages on this site use nearly the full page width for writing text. To those of you for whom the slightest inconvenience is unforgivable, we offer the compensation that the newest scientific research indicates that being required to rapidly move your eyes from the left to the right, and vice versa, improves your memory...and, who knows, possibly even your intelligence.
WARNING: This site sometimes engages in sarcasm and political satire!
WND/Tancredo: 